Posted April 2, 2015 in "Students"
Two WPI students among Worcester’s budding writers published in The Worcester Journal
Alexandra D’Ordine ’17 is an unabashed, self-described “Whovian”–that is, she “absolutely loves” the enduring television show “Doctor Who.”
On
the air for more than five decades in numerous iterations, she
acknowledges its “endearing cheesiness,” but also points out how
universal and influential it is.
“The
stories have a deeper meaning if you’re willing to look for it, yet
it’s entertaining on the surface,” she says.
The
19-year-old biochemistry and professional writing major expounds on
the show’s history, impact on popular culture, and universality at
length in her well-researched article “The Doctor Is In” in the
latest edition of the online literary magazine, The
Worcester Journal.
Launched in September by WPI instructor and prolific writer James
Dempsey, it provides a showcase for budding young writers from
greater Worcester.
D’Ordine
and Warren “Michael” Singh ’17 represent WPI’s writing talent
in the magazine’s second edition.
Singh,
a chemical engineering major, contributed two critical essays to the
Journal–one a review of the complex and existential 2013 film
Upstream Color,
the other an
analysis of James Stein’s The
Right Decision, a
self-help book of sorts based on decision theory.
“Really, what appealed to me was that it seemed like an outlet for writing that didn’t fit into what is usually accessible to students on campus,” Singh, who enjoys writing but acknowledges that he doesn’t always have the “focus or intellectual impetus” to sit down and do so, says of contributing to the Journal. “That is, it wasn’t campus newspaper writing, which didn’t interest me in the slightest—and it wasn’t classroom writing, which meant that I could think about things to write about and just go for them at my own pace.”
“Really, what appealed to me was that it seemed like an outlet for writing that didn’t fit into what is usually accessible to students on campus,” Singh, who enjoys writing but acknowledges that he doesn’t always have the “focus or intellectual impetus” to sit down and do so, says of contributing to the Journal. “That is, it wasn’t campus newspaper writing, which didn’t interest me in the slightest—and it wasn’t classroom writing, which meant that I could think about things to write about and just go for them at my own pace.”
D’Ordine,
meanwhile, who has taken Dempsey’s Introduction to Journalism
course, applauded the Journal’s diverse nature.
“I
thought it was a good idea to represent college writers from
Worcester in general, instead of one particular university,” she
says.
With
an emphasis on creative nonfiction, the magazine presents a menagerie
of memoirs, poems, essays on history and pop culture, book and movie
reviews, and photos and illustrations from local high school and
college students.
In
D’Ordine’s piece, she dissects the recent popularity of the
reinvigorated “Doctor Who” franchise, which chronicles the
exploits of a “Time Lord” and his living time machine, Time and
Relative Dimension in Space (or, more popularly, T.A.R.D.I.S., housed
in a telephone callbox).
“I
enjoy writing because, even though I’m personally not a public
speaker, I can organize my thoughts in writing and communicate with
many others,” says D’Ordine, who plans to continue study of
molecular biology and biochemistry in graduate school. “I want to
use the writing skills I’m learning in conjunction with research to
facilitate scientific communication among scientists and with the
general public.”
Meanwhile,
in his review of the high-concept, not-easily-defined “Upstream
Color,” Singh describes the movie by Shane Carruth as “rife with
alternative approaches to direction, narrative, writing, and sound,”
and “definitely a film that is on the outer side of the artistic
envelope.
His
review of The
Right Decision came
about as part of a larger contemplative process. A bibliophile who
describes bookstores as his “Kryptonite catnip,” Singh had been
mulling the process of decision making, odds, and outcomes after
reading a number of books and articles.
“The
book was really fun and helpful in that it took techniques and
analytical approaches from a quantitative field of study—game
theory—and applied it to real life,” he explaines, noting the
commonalities of both, including incomplete information and
nebulously defined probabilities. “It was fantastic to have this
concrete methodology with which to approach making good decisions.”
However,
he says, it was also a reality check, because in life, outcomes are
uncertain, “correct” actions aren’t guaranteed to lead to good
results, and good things can happen to bad people (and vice versa).
“A’s
(and success) really aren’t awarded for effort,” says Singh. “But
knowing how to make good decisions makes it much more comforting.
You’re able to say to yourself, ‘even if things turned out badly,
I did everything I could with what I had at the time.’”
Dempsey
was integral to the pre-writing process, he says—a trusted mentor
to bounce ideas off of.
D’Ordine,
meanwhile, says that she applied feedback learned throughout
Dempsey’s journalism class to her revision process. “By the end
of the class I felt like I was on my way to developing a more
journalistic voice to use in the future.”
A
copy editor for The
Towers,
she says she generally likes to write about campus events,
particularly those related to music. She also tutors at WPI’s
Writing Center with a goal to “help others discover not only the
practicality of writing, but how it can be a great way to find their
voice,” she says. “Everyone has their own nuances and style.”
D’Ordine’s "The Doctor Is In."
Singh’s
Doing the Right Thing.
Singh’s
Upstream Color.
BY
TARYN PLUMB
Original story link.
No comments:
Post a Comment